Rflct

Optics chain mapped the digital purchase decision

A JDE study for a Swedish optics chain revealed fundamentally different purchase processes for contact lenses and eyewear, and identified conversion barriers that never appeared in traditional surveys.

Background One of Sweden's leading optics chains wanted to understand why digital conversion was significantly lower for contact lenses than for eyewear, despite high online visit numbers. Traditional surveys had not provided sufficient answers. ## Challenge The optics industry has a unique dynamic: the customer needs to book an eye examination, choose a product category (eyewear, contact lenses, sunglasses) and then choose a channel (store, e-commerce, subscription). The purchase decision spans weeks and involves both medical and aesthetic considerations. The chain's existing research asked customers what they thought, but did not capture how the decision process actually looked: which channels were used, in what order, and where in the process did intention change? ## Reflect's work We conducted a Journey Decision Engine study (JDE) that mapped the entire purchase decision process for both product categories. The method combines quantitative purchase narratives with AI classification to identify decision points, channel switches and conversion barriers. ### Contact lenses The JDE study revealed that contact lens customers had a primarily digital purchase process but that conversion broke down at three specific points: (1) uncertainty about lens type without physical advice, (2) complexity of the subscription model, and (3) lack of price comparison between channels. ### Eyewear Eyewear customers showed a completely different pattern: initial research happened online but the final choice was almost exclusively store-based. The critical drivers were try-on experience and personal style advice. ## Results The study led the chain to differentiate its digital strategy per product category instead of using a uniform approach.

Key takeaways

  • Fundamentally different purchase processes for contact lenses and eyewear
  • Three specific conversion barriers for contact lenses identified
  • AI classification of purchase narratives revealed hidden patterns
  • Differentiated digital strategy per product category

Related articles

How online purchase decisions actually work

Online purchase decisions are not the linear funnel most models assume. They are iterative, chaotic processes where customers jump between channels, compare, abandon and return - often without being aware of the pattern themselves.

Why funnel models fail

The funnel model assumes customers move linearly from awareness to purchase. In reality they jump back and forth, leave the funnel, return via a different channel and make decisions based on factors the funnel doesn't capture.

AI classification of purchase narratives - how and why

Open-ended questions about purchase decisions yield rich data but are time-consuming to analyze manually. AI classification makes it possible to identify decision themes, motivation and barriers in thousands of narratives with consistency that manual coding cannot match.

Experimental design in journey research

Observation shows what customers do, but not why. By combining observation with experimental manipulation - changing price, channel experience or information availability - we can isolate what actually drives decisions from what merely correlates.

Reflect's journey analysis framework

Reflect's customer journey framework combines three methods: real-time observation of online behavior, AI classification of decision narratives and experimental design. Together they give a picture of how customers actually buy - not how they say they do.

See related service

Want to understand how your customers' purchase decisions actually look?

Contact us
Back to How purchase decisions are actually made - not how customers say