Rflct

How an optics chain mapped the digital purchase decision

By observing actual online purchase behavior instead of asking about it, the chain identified conversion barriers that had never surfaced in traditional surveys.

A leading Nordic optics chain faced a challenge: they knew a growing share of the purchase decision happened online, but did not understand how the process actually worked. Traditional customer surveys gave answers that did not match actual behavior — customers said they compared prices, but behavioral data showed they got stuck in entirely different parts of the process.

Reflect conducted a Journey Decision Engine (JDE) study that observed how customers actually navigated the online purchase process. Instead of asking 'how do you choose?' we followed the decision process in real time and used AI classification to interpret purchase narratives.

The study revealed fundamental differences between product categories. Contact lens customers exhibited almost transactional behavior — they knew what they wanted and sought the most efficient path. Eyewear customers, however, had an exploratory process with more touchpoints, where inspiration and visual presentation played a decisive role.

Results were visualized as Sankey diagrams clearly showing decision flows per segment and channel. The chain could identify exactly where in the process potential customers dropped off and which touchpoints had the greatest impact on conversion.

Key takeaways

  • Actual behavior differs markedly from self-reported behavior
  • Contact lenses and eyewear have fundamentally different purchase processes
  • Conversion barriers were identified that never appeared in surveys
  • AI classification of purchase narratives revealed hidden decision paths

Related articles

How online purchase decisions actually work

Online purchase decisions are not the linear funnel most models assume. They are iterative, chaotic processes where customers jump between channels, compare, abandon and return — often without being aware of the pattern themselves.

Why funnel models fail

The funnel model assumes customers move linearly from awareness to purchase. In reality they jump back and forth, leave the funnel, return via a different channel and make decisions based on factors the funnel doesn't capture.

AI classification of purchase narratives — how and why

Open-ended questions about purchase decisions yield rich data but are time-consuming to analyze manually. AI classification makes it possible to identify decision themes, motivation and barriers in thousands of narratives with consistency that manual coding cannot match.

Experimental design in journey research

Observation shows what customers do, but not why. By combining observation with experimental manipulation — changing price, channel experience or information availability — we can isolate what actually drives decisions from what merely correlates.

Reflect's journey analysis framework

Reflect's customer journey framework combines three methods: real-time observation of online behavior, AI classification of decision narratives and experimental design. Together they give a picture of how customers actually buy — not how they say they do.

See related service
Back to How purchase decisions are actually made — not how customers say